Burchill on bazookas and burkas

October 10, 2008

keeley-hazell-baywatch.jpg

It’s Friday, so let’s have a look at what the red tops have to say about the world. A glance at the Sun is enough, for there we find Julie Burchill, the high priestess of contemporary counter-intuitive feminism, in rude health. A self-proclaimed “TOTAL feminist”, Burchill comes out with all guns (or should that, in Sun-speak, be ‘bazookas’?) blazing in favour of naked female breasts. She doesn’t like women wearing burkas, for to do so is to obscure their breasts. Here’s a line or two from Ms Burchill’s textbook example of the tabloid feature:

As someone who has never had any trouble getting three-dimensional cuties to get their kit off without paying for it, maybe, as a Christian, I shouldn’t judge those who can’t.

But equally weird are those who get upset about naked photos, be they of curvy, lad-mag totty or titless, high-fashion hottie. What are they scared of? And DON’T tell me that voluntary, well-paid, kit-offing is an offence against everything feminists have historically fought for.

Brilliant. Just DON’T argue, OK? Burchill concludes in similarly unabashed tones:

Where the female body is forcibly covered in public, you will find mass sexual enslavement.

Which is the more offensive? If you really find freedom more frightening and distasteful than the lack of it when it comes to women taking their clothes off, then I suggest it is you, and not the likes of Keeley [a renowned Sun Page 3 girl], who has the wrong attitude.

A few weeks wearing the badge of shame that is the burka might sort out your priorities a treat, my sour sisters.

And if you find inner peace by dressing like a parrot’s cage that someone forgot to take the drape off of, good for you!

Just don’t expect the rest of us to follow you.

Many of us, if we were asked to follow Burchill – for example, on a guided tour of a country in the Middle East – might also decline. Politely, of course.

Image of Keeley Hazell – tipped to star in Baywatch – courtesy of Ninja Dude

 

2 Responses to “Burchill on bazookas and burkas”

[...] There are many who would say that Hef is a dinosaur – an amiable one, perhaps, but a dinosaur nevertheless. Perhaps, when he is gone, he will be revered, studied even, and maybe – indeed, almost certainly – a Hollywood director will make a film of his life, a kind of Jurassic Park with cleavage. Meanwhile, for another take on what’s at the heart of all this – depictions of women, sans much, if any, clothing – click this link to read Libby Purves’ views on the great Page Three Girl debate. [...]

[...] if he’d already left this mortal coil when the offending piece was published (by none other than Julie Burchill), offence couldn’t have been taken. (Note: the court found for [...]

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

From the inside of the maze, ethically outwards

February 9, 2012

Curious times in the media; strange days at The Times.

Would ‘Dacre Cards‘ – the system of licensing journalists proposed by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre – have prevented the embarrassment now palpable at the Times over the NightJack story?

Times editor James Harding’s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry seemed heartfelt and contrite, albeit that the paper’s former long-serving and much-respected lawyer, Alastair Brett, seems to have been, er, rather dropped in it. Clearly, mistakes were made with regard to NightJack by young reporter Patrick Foster who, once he had hacked into NightJack’s account and thus discovered his identity, then embarked on a quest to expose it via legitimate methods. This, as Inquiry counsel Robert Jay QC put it, was “rather like working from the inside of the maze out”.

But had Foster been licensed via a Dacre Card, would this unsavoury episode in the Times’s history have been avoided?

We suspect not. A raft of laws were in existence at precisely the time when many News of the World journalists seemed to believe that they were entitled to hack any phone they liked. Those laws forbade them from doing so, and yet made no difference. Aside from the obvious objection to them – that they will squeeze out freelancers and citizen journalists – Dacre Cards would simply amount to something to circumvent.

What is really required is an ethical shake-up, from top to bottom. Society generally – not just journalists – needs a sense that some things are just plain wrong.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.