- Posted by:
- on November 5, 2009 at 4:35 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by adamjones, Spada PR. Spada PR said: Support the British Disabled Flying Association BDFA at its charity auction http://bit.ly/2wlb05 [...]
The BDFA, a charity which is run by disabled people to offer disabled and disadvantaged people the opportunity to enjoy the experience of flying, is holding a fundraising auction on the 28th November.
The BDFA opens flying to the disabled and profoundly ill, and in doing so makes a genuine impact on people’s lives. It operates four adapted light aircraft, but it needs key funding to maintain its offering.
The auction offers a fantastic way to get involved in the charity, with the potential to enjoy extremely high quality prizes including:
- A flight of a lifetime with the Breitling Jet Team
- Perform your own wing walking display
- Flight in a P.51 Mustang
- Fly with the Blades
- Night at the Army Flying Museum
- Signed Red Arrows flying suit
- Dinner party in your own home by Best in the Business
- A DJ on a Radio Breakfast Show
- Luxury London hotel stay and tickets to see Chicago
plus many more!
To bid on a lot, and support the charity, please go to: www.aviatorsball.co.uk
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by adamjones, Spada PR. Spada PR said: Support the British Disabled Flying Association BDFA at its charity auction http://bit.ly/2wlb05 [...]
The headline says it all: ‘Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger takes pay cut‘.
Dan Sabbagh’s piece says a bit more: said editor ‘emailed staff at the newspaper to say that his salary in the upcoming 2012-13 financial year will be £395,010, compared with £438,900 in the current financial year’.
Some voices say: ‘How worthy.’
Others opine: ‘Well, he would, wouldn’t he?’
But we say: good work by Mr Rusbridger. For the sake of the media’s survival, we hope that others in senior positions in the industry will follow suit.
Image of toolkit allegedly deployed by Alan Rusbridger courtesy of Flickr user LollyKnit.
Curious times in the media; strange days at The Times.
Would ‘Dacre Cards‘ – the system of licensing journalists proposed by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre – have prevented the embarrassment now palpable at the Times over the NightJack story?
Times editor James Harding’s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry seemed heartfelt and contrite, albeit that the paper’s former long-serving and much-respected lawyer, Alastair Brett, seems to have been, er, rather dropped in it. Clearly, mistakes were made with regard to NightJack by young reporter Patrick Foster who, once he had hacked into NightJack’s account and thus discovered his identity, then embarked on a quest to expose it via legitimate methods. This, as Inquiry counsel Robert Jay QC put it, was “rather like working from the inside of the maze out”.
But had Foster been licensed via a Dacre Card, would this unsavoury episode in the Times’s history have been avoided?
We suspect not. A raft of laws were in existence at precisely the time when many News of the World journalists seemed to believe that they were entitled to hack any phone they liked. Those laws forbade them from doing so, and yet made no difference. Aside from the obvious objection to them – that they will squeeze out freelancers and citizen journalists – Dacre Cards would simply amount to something to circumvent.
What is really required is an ethical shake-up, from top to bottom. Society generally – not just journalists – needs a sense that some things are just plain wrong.
Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?
We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.