Diary of a Magazine Editor: Work Inexperience

April 15, 2011
Jean

Alex Wade drops us a quick note as his tenth issue of Cornwall Today goes to press.

The relief as another issue is off stone is palpable. This one, the May issue, is themed to art. It gave me a few headaches, mainly because there are so many excellent artists in Cornwall that featuring them all simply wasn’t possible, but also because of the cover. I went for something a little bit ‘out there’ in the end and hope it was the right call.

But meanwhile, before I hit the road for a well-earned surf at Sennen Cove, here are some observations on what not to do if you are on work experience. Regrettably, they are based on personal experience.

1. Do not stare sullenly at your desk, looking as if you hate every minute of your day.

2. Do not ring your friends on the company phone and tell them how much you hate work experience.

3. Do not go on Facebook and moan about work experience.

4. Do not, when given a task, refuse to do it.

5. Do not explode into rage when a friend calls you on your mobile.

6. Do not, in the office loo, ring your mother and rant at her for making you do some work experience.

Follow those simple steps, putative workers of the world, and you’re sure to be fine. Oh, and by the way – yes, there really is a connection between the forthcoming May issue of Cornwall Today and Jean Shrimpton, the world’s first supermodel.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

If you’re Joey Barton, attack is not the best form of defence

May 17, 2012

Interesting times, these, in the life of Joey Barton.

If the violence displayed by the QPR captain at Manchester City last Sunday was remarkable, his subsequent conduct on Twitter has been astonishing. Barton appears to have radically reinterpreted the notion that attack is the best form of defence, lashing out at all and sundry via a series of tweets whose ultimate effect is entirely self-destructive.

In the past 24 hours, Barton has accepted one charge of violent conduct at the Etihad Stadium but denied another. The FA seems set to throw the book at him, and his club has declared that it will deal with the matter after the result of the FA investigation. Conspiracy theorists might conclude that QPR’s management team and board hope that the FA ban Barton for so long a period (four months and more) that their reported desire to rip up his contract can only be bolstered.

What, then, should Barton do? Should he:

(a) Keep his head down and say nothing, or

(b) Issue a sensible statement in which he acknowledges that both his conduct at the Etihad and subsequent tweets have brought QPR into disrepute, and

(c) Add an apology to said statement, or

(d) Go to Portugal, log onto Twitter and tweet that the world is against him but that he doesn’t care because everyone is a moron and he’s worked really hard to get where he is and if anyone is nasty to him again he is going to expose their secrets.

The answer is not (d).

The moral of the story is that if you’re a loose cannon, when you turn attack into defence there is a danger that you will blow yourself up.

Gunning foglessly for clarity

May 15, 2012

A fine piece, this, on Winston Churchill’s gift for language and the obscurantism that goes with so much corporate communication.

But wait, what’s this? Could this injunction have been phrased rather more successfully:

Be concrete, not abstract. Use metaphors to get your message across.

Metaphors are, by definition, not exactly concrete. But be that as it may: there is a lot of sound advice in Clare Lynch’s piece and a revelation, too. We had never heard of the Gunning Fog Index.  But it exists, and reveals the age at which someone would have to leave full-time education to understand given text.

We’re pleased to display our own Gunning Fog rating for the above words. That of the Churchill speech cited by Ms Lynch was 9.698.

The Gunning Fog index is 9.585

Spin at the Leveson Inquiry

May 9, 2012
Leveson witch hunt

The idea that Lord Justice Leveson and his Inquiry’s QC, Robert Jay, are in need of PR advice is intriguing.

Surely their respective tasks ought to be immune from spin? Then again, perhaps the way in which they execute them is deserving of some communications advice. Either way, times have changed. A similar inquiry from yesteryear (and such do exist) would surely not have been accompanied, albeit informally, by communications advice.

Pictured courtesy of this Flickr user: a portrait of the Leveson Inquiry.