Exclusive: Brown to sue Sky for false imprisonment

October 1, 2009

gordon brown hero

The Scene: a secret room in a secret Brighton hotel. Present are Gordon Brown, his wife Sarah, a Top Lawyer From A Leading City Firm and sundry apparatchiks. As they dip their cookies in their coffees, they look nervous, apprehensive, perhaps even fearful.

Sarah Brown: My hero, my husband, this is not good enough.

Prime Minister: I believe in this country. I go to bed thinking of my countrymen every night. As such, I want to talk about policy, from a terrible hour onwards.

Sarah: Yes, my hero, but we’ve been working so hard on your human side. Sometimes you have to accept that pesky TV interviewers will want to talk about it, too.

Prime Minister: I can accept that. But there is personality in policy, surely?

Sarah: No, my hero, this is where you are wrong. And losing your cool when asked whether you have a human side is not good, from the PR point of view.

Prime Minister: I cannot accept that. It seems to me to be an intellectually flawed supposition. Surely my loss of cool illustrates precisely the human side you so adore?

Sarah (swooning): My hero, how I could I not adore your dark and brooding temper, especially when it erupts like an undersea volcano? And yes, you are right to allude to this curious paradox. You erupt, therefore you exist, it is true, while in contrast, when you are dormant, no one knows if you are human. But, my hero, you must refrain from erupting on television.

Apparatchik with grey beard: Excellency, your wife is right. It is never a good idea to lose one’s cool publicly.

Apparatchik with blue beard: Excellency, I agree. Only the most inept of PR advisors would contend that storming out of a live interview has a silver lining.

Sarah: My hero, don’t take this the wrong way. You may be noisy and messy but I love you. The problem is, how do we convince the country to do likewise come the election?

There is a deathly silence as all clasp their chins in their hands and stare forlornly at the wall. Suddenly, the Top Lawyer From A Leading City Firm coughs.

Top Lawyer: There may be a way in which we can launch a counter-attack, legally speaking.

Prime Minister (swarthily, firmly): Go on.

Top Lawyer: Well, it seems to me that you have a claim for false imprisonment against Sky News.

Prime Minister (darkly): Go on.

Top Lawyer: Can it be a coincidence that within hours of the Murdoch-owned Sun announcing that it would not be supporting the government, i.e., your good self, the Murdoch-owned Sky News chains you to an interviewer’s chair?

Prime Minister (with a menacing smile): My thoughts exactly. You are almost as clever as me. Go on.

Top Lawyer: It seems to me that when you attempted to storm out of the interview you were prevented from doing so by microphone wires which tethered you to your chair. This is a clear case of false imprisonment and an infringement of your human right to storm out of interviews if you wish.

Sarah: My hero, my husband! How dare they do this to you!

Top Lawyer: They did it because they can. But so can we. With your permission, Excellency, I will issue a writ.

Prime Minister: How much money will I win?

Sarah: My hero, it’s not about the money! It’s about the people of this country, the ones you think about all the time, especially at night when you’re moodily muttering into your toothpaste.

Apparatchik with bon mot: Excellency, it’s about fighting for what’s right.

Prime Minister: Then go forth and issue the writ. Sue Sky News! Sue The Sun! But most of all, sue the government!

There is silence as all absorb this edict. Eventually, Sarah Brown speaks.

Sarah: My hero, is the strain getting to you?

There is no answer, for the Prime Minister has angrily stormed into a door.

Pictured courtesy of Randy Son of Robert: ‘behind every great woman is a hero’ – the Prime Minister and his wife go for a walk.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.