If newspapers are dying, what about PR?

April 22, 2009

clay-shirky.jpgThe time has come not to try and save newspapers but to mourn their demise and experiment with what might replace them. That is the stark, but irresistible, message of internet philosopher Clay Shirky, whose magnificent post on the death of newspapers should be read by everyone with an interest not merely in publishing and journalism but in society, per se. But there is more to Shirky’s post than doom-mongering. Much, much more – not least for everyone working in PR.

First, though, a recap of Shirky’s superb post. Shirky argues that we are living in the midst of a revolution – one caused by the internet – in which the key question is not ‘How do we save newspapers?’ but ‘What will come in their place – and what will journalism look like when the old world has gone?’ Dan Kennedy picked up on this in yesterday’s Guardian, confessing to more than a mild sense of disquiet as he looked into the crystal ball so brilliantly illumined by Shirky and realised that nothing will save newspapers, least of all charging for online content, as appears to be the au courant thinking among those who believe, like Canute, that they can resist the implacable forces of change.

Shirky’s analysis is cast-iron. Take this paragraph, for example:

When someone demands to know how we are going to replace newspapers, they are really demanding to be told that we are not living through a revolution. They are demanding to be told that old systems won’t break before new systems are in place. They are demanding to be told that ancient social bargains aren’t in peril, that core institutions will be spared, that new methods of spreading information will improve previous practice rather than upending it. They are demanding to be lied to. There are fewer and fewer people who can convincingly tell such a lie.

It is honest, too. Shirky knows that the economics of traditional newspaper publishing make it doomed, but admits that he doesn’t know what will replace newspapers. The point, though, is that no one does. All publishers can do is experiment, and see what sticks. The process will take decades, but that it is underway cannot be doubted.

But if newspapers are on the deathbed, what of PR? The art of spin is hardly a modern invention, but its primary source of expression, in recent years, has been the newspaper. It may seem inconceivable today, but there will come a time when the Sunday supplements do not entail the felling of a small forest, when news – and features, and obituaries, and law reports, and property stories, and all the rest of it – will not be digested via the black ink of a printing press and its stamp on paper. We’ll pick up all this, and more, in digital form. What, then, of the press officer, when the press doesn’t exist?

Just as journalism is undergoing a huge and remarkable transformation, so too is PR. The astute PRs, whether in legal services, property, finance or media, should also be reading Shirky – and asking themsleves what they’ll be doing when the known world is no more.

 

One Response to “If newspapers are dying, what about PR?”

[...] the newspaper industry. Her piece reads as an attempt at some positive media PR in response to Clay Shirky’s definitive essay on the decline of newspapers, but for all its good intentions, it doesn’t seem to say very [...]

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.