Libel Lawyers: Positive PR Needed?

March 26, 2009

libel-dragon-fly.jpg

Jo Glanville writes passionately in today’s Guardian about what Lord Hoffman called “the blackmailing effect” of our libel laws. She bemoans the no win, no fee regime and laments the fact that, according to a recent study by the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at Oxford University, the cost of libel litigation in England and Wales is 140 times the average elsewhere in Europe. As she puts it, the present system has turned “the libel courts into casinos”.

Unfortunately, all this has been said since time immemorial. Indeed, so hackneyed do the arguments over libel appear to be – on both sides – that Blade sometimes wonders whether this grandiose bickering has assumed the form of a curious English ritual. Talking of which, when confronted with the barrage of cliche that libel, like no other area of law, seems destined to provoke, Blade wishes he could travel in a time machine to a society which settled its disputes by means of a good old-fashioned duel. After all, it was good enough for Joseph Conrad, so why not?

But despite his weariness when it comes to hearing the same tired old phrases trotted out (next up: “London is the libel capital of the world”), Blade is, at the end of the day, an Article 10 man. As such, he too is in mournful mood. The cause is a conversation he had with his literary agent recently. She told Blade that it was becoming more and more difficult to place “tricky” manuscripts, i.e., those with some degree of legal risk. “Publishers don’t want to touch them,” she said. “They get scared off by the prospect of fighting a huge legal battle.” She even said that, as an agent, she was increasingly familiar with the libel lawyers’ letter before action. “If I get a lawyer’s letter, that’s usually it,” she confessed. “The MS is returned to the author.”

But libel isn’t all bad. It exists for a purpose. It is blatantly wrong for a newspaper such as the Express to publish a series of falsehoods about Kate and Gerry McCann, and it is right that those so vilified have a means of redress. But maybe – just maybe – it’s time for the claimant libel lawyers to highlight the good they do, rather than stand on the back foot and simply rebut the many attacks made on them. In other words, the ancient tort of libel might just need bit of trendy 21st century PR.

Pictured: a dragonfly of the family Libellulidae found throughout Europe, Asia, and North America. With thanks to Martin Werker.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.