Markets and the Moon

July 12, 2010
slim gaillard

A new lunar cycle is upon us. So what, we hear you say? What possible bearing could the state of the moon have on the professional community, those of us who ply our trades in PR, law, marketing, accounting, not to mention the financial markets? To suggest a correlation between the moon and the markets is as sensible as postulating that the earth is not round but square.

But hold on. When no less a figure than the estimable Merryn Somerset Webb reveals the results of a study into whether there could be a correlation between the lunar cycle and stock market performance even the most cynical among us should take note. And no, not because we fear that Merryn may have lost her marbles. The FT scribe makes some provocative points, which, we confess, had hitherto eluded us:

1. Did you know that a Harvard Business Review a few years ago noted that during the seven days before a new moon and the seven days after a new moon, average stock market returns are higher than at other times? Not just in the US, but all over the world.

2. Apparently, some fund managers factor such research into their work, the suggestion being that our levels of serotonin rise and fall as the moon moves (lower when the moon is new, higher when it is full). Thus our mood – and attitude towards the market – changes as they do so.

3. Next up, some new research by the technical analysis team at RBS. It looked at the performance of six different stock market indices – the FTSE 100, the S&P 500, the Dax, the EuroStoxx 50, the Hang Seng and the CAC40 – in relation to the lunar cycle. Of their findings, Somerset Webb writes:

Take the FTSE 100. The average daily change since 1986 has been 0.5522 points or 0.02 per cent, according to RBS. On a new moon day, it has been rather higher at 5.17 points or 0.11 per cent – and, on a full moon day, it has been higher still, at 6.42 points or 0.13 per cent. So about 10 times higher than average for both.

But as she rightly says, this isn’t nearly so interesting as the RBS team’s next finding:

The RBS team then looked at what happened if you traded just twice a month, on the day of a new moon (or the next trading day if the new moon falls on a weekend) and on the day of the full moon (or next trading day). If you had started with £1,000 and bought on the new moon and sold on the full moon consistently since 1984, you’d now have £12,116 – making a nice profit of £11,116. If you’d bought on the full moon and sold on the new moon, you’d have ended up with a mere £2,036.

4. Lest lunar madness now seizes you, Somerset Webb cautions that “previous studies found that while, on average, lunar trades came good, they only did so 60 per cent of the time. ” She also adds that many studies overlook sneaky little problems like transaction fees and index fund management fees.

So, what to do? Today is the first day of trading since the new moon (which appeared on Saturday), and the full moon is a couple of weeks hence on July 26. We say: buy today, sell on July 26. But then again, our serotonin levels might not be quite in order – a problem with which good old Slim Gaillard was familiar.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.

An excellent ad if ever there was one

January 25, 2012
legovader

We seem to be visually led this week but sometimes words proliferate far too much and letting an image do the talking is no bad thing. That’s another way of saying that ACCESS Agency’s work with Lego is absolutely top drawer.