Plum Job at The Times

January 28, 2009

times-newsroom.jpg

Blade has, for the first time in years, come down with the ‘flu. As in, the Real McCoy, not any of its convenient, I’ll-have-day-off-work variants. As such, Swordplay may take on a minimalist hue over the next couple of days, but Blade feels he must alert legal folk out there to a prime job which has just come up.

It’s to replace the estimable Gill Phillips, in-house solicitor at The Times. Gill is leaving to become Head of Legal at The Guardian. Her replacement at The Times will report to Alastair Brett, the paper’s long-serving senior lawyer, and work with the similarly excellent Pat Burge in a legal team of three.

Apparently Gill’s role was advertised somewhat quietly in The Times a few days ago, but nowhere else in the legal press.  It’s a superb opportunity for media lawyers with perhaps two to four years’ PQE. If you’re interested, The Times’ legal department would be delighted to hear from you. Meanwhile, Swordplay wishes Gill Phillips the very best at The Guardian.

Pictured: The Times’ newsroom. The journalists are nice to in-house lawyers. Honest.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

From the inside of the maze, ethically outwards

February 9, 2012

Curious times in the media; strange days at The Times.

Would ‘Dacre Cards‘ – the system of licensing journalists proposed by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre – have prevented the embarrassment now palpable at the Times over the NightJack story?

Times editor James Harding’s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry seemed heartfelt and contrite, albeit that the paper’s former long-serving and much-respected lawyer, Alastair Brett, seems to have been, er, rather dropped in it. Clearly, mistakes were made with regard to NightJack by young reporter Patrick Foster who, once he had hacked into NightJack’s account and thus discovered his identity, then embarked on a quest to expose it via legitimate methods. This, as Inquiry counsel Robert Jay QC put it, was “rather like working from the inside of the maze out”.

But had Foster been licensed via a Dacre Card, would this unsavoury episode in the Times’s history have been avoided?

We suspect not. A raft of laws were in existence at precisely the time when many News of the World journalists seemed to believe that they were entitled to hack any phone they liked. Those laws forbade them from doing so, and yet made no difference. Aside from the obvious objection to them – that they will squeeze out freelancers and citizen journalists – Dacre Cards would simply amount to something to circumvent.

What is really required is an ethical shake-up, from top to bottom. Society generally – not just journalists – needs a sense that some things are just plain wrong.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.