Sarkozy, Power and Politics

July 28, 2009

lord-castle

Blade objects, with the haughty disdain of a supermodel, to Max Davidson’s condemnation in the Telegraph of French President Nicolas Sarkozy as “a textbook case of an ageing man clinging to youth”.

Davidson lambasts Sarkozy for “sporting funky tracksuits  and demonstrating his virility by taking a trophy wife”, not to mention the grave sin of hiring a personal trainer. The Telegraph hack’s evisceration of Sarkozy – who, of course, recently collapsed while jogging – contains rhetorial questions, such as “Quite how an intelligent man like Sarkozy has become such an out-and-out fitness freak, pushing his body to the extremes of exhaustion in pursuit of the mirage of physical perfection, is a question for a psychiatrist” – before concluding that “If he were not the President, he would be a laughing-stock.”

It appears that Davidson’s ire has been provoked by the notion that being fit is a good thing.  As he says: “Go into any gym in London and you will see men with that same tormented look on their face – one per cent pleasure, 99 per cent pain. Why do they do it? Even they don’t know.” Armed with palpable contempt for those who believe that being physically fit is of value, Davidson concocts a theory that politicians across the globe have embraced some sort of cult of the body in an attempt to woo us, the “gullible voters”. He wonders where it all went wrong, perhaps dreaming of the days when the ruling class were fat and slothful, content to wear the results of their wealth around their vast waists, before sounding a spurious cautionary note: “Fitness fanatics are a law unto themselves, desperately trying to keep the Grim Reaper at bay but, as often as not, pushing themselves closer to an early grave.”

Blade is not impressed. History abounds with examples of high achieving men – and women – for whom fidelity to Juvenal’s maxim mens sana in corpore sano has paid dividends. It is unfortunate that Sarkozy collapsed while jogging but little more, and certainly not indicative of a dread societal trend. We should continue to admire those who manage to stay in shape at the same time as occupying positions of responsibility and, yes, power, mindful that those very same people, as age catches up with them, will doubtless have the sense to listen to their bodies and adapt their training regimes.

Then again, Davidson is writing in the Telegraph. How close was he to announcing also that Carla Bruni is the source of all the French President’s woes? For to paraphrase, in Torygraph-speak, the old saying: behind every great man stands a supermodel pushing him to the brink. Oh, if only the Suffragettes hadn’t had their way!

Pictured thanks to John McNab: Lord Castlerosse, star columnist of the London Daily Express, Surrey, United Kingdom, August 1940 – a role model for hacks and politicians the world over.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

From the inside of the maze, ethically outwards

February 9, 2012

Curious times in the media; strange days at The Times.

Would ‘Dacre Cards‘ – the system of licensing journalists proposed by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre – have prevented the embarrassment now palpable at the Times over the NightJack story?

Times editor James Harding’s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry seemed heartfelt and contrite, albeit that the paper’s former long-serving and much-respected lawyer, Alastair Brett, seems to have been, er, rather dropped in it. Clearly, mistakes were made with regard to NightJack by young reporter Patrick Foster who, once he had hacked into NightJack’s account and thus discovered his identity, then embarked on a quest to expose it via legitimate methods. This, as Inquiry counsel Robert Jay QC put it, was “rather like working from the inside of the maze out”.

But had Foster been licensed via a Dacre Card, would this unsavoury episode in the Times’s history have been avoided?

We suspect not. A raft of laws were in existence at precisely the time when many News of the World journalists seemed to believe that they were entitled to hack any phone they liked. Those laws forbade them from doing so, and yet made no difference. Aside from the obvious objection to them – that they will squeeze out freelancers and citizen journalists – Dacre Cards would simply amount to something to circumvent.

What is really required is an ethical shake-up, from top to bottom. Society generally – not just journalists – needs a sense that some things are just plain wrong.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.