Scattergun PR: Why It’s Rubbish (Usually)

July 30, 2009

orgasmic

Swordplay’s denizens work in PR. We work with journalists on a daily basis and know that bombarding them with irrelevant press releases or pushy follow up calls does no one any favours. But according to our sometime scribe, Alex Wade, there’s an awful lot of bad PR out there. Read on, as he confronts EU agricultural law, e-Recruitment and National Orgasm Day.

It’s a bright, sunny morning. What a relief after the recent deluge. I fire up my laptop and set about writing something. It’s going well and I don’t mind the insistent ‘ping’ of emails wending their way to me. I could close Outlook to avoid the intrusion of email, but I quite like the distraction, stopping writing every 15 minutes or so to see who’s emailed me and about what.

Today, though, I seem to be in receipt of an excess of poorly judged PR. Press releases which bear no relation to one’s fields of expertise are an occupational hazard and there is a very simple way of dealing with them. It involves the ‘delete’ button. But today I’m subject to an onslaught. One man’s spam may be another’s manna but given that I write about coastal matters, the law, sport, travel and art (OK, a wide brief), why am I being exhorted to take an interest in genomic medicine? I will never write about this in a million years, as is also the case for the following, all of which have come my way thanks to Scattergun PR:

1. e-Recruitment in Ireland. I’m sure this is an excellent innovation but it’s not my thing.

2. Modifications to the Subaru WRX. Subarus are great cars but I am not, have never been and am unlikely ever to be a motoring journalist.

3. Exciting news about a Saville Row tailor. Or perhaps it’s a tailor who’s not on Saville Row but should be. But doesn’t want to be, because the rents are too high. As such, he’s happy to ply his trade elsewhere. Or she is. I can’t remember and, truth to tell, I never knew. This press release was instantaneously deleted.

4. EU agricultural law and policy. Yes, I write about the law, but usually with a media slant. Have I ever written about agricultural law? No. Will I ever write about agricultural law? No.

5. National Orgasm Day. An organisation which makes sex toys asks that we all say ‘Yes!’ tomorrow, it being National Orgasm Day. I didn’t know that National Orgasm Day looms, and though this is of course good news I do wonder whether writing about it is quite my thing.

Then again, who knows? Perhaps one of my editors might go for a feature? Maybe I’d better give this one some thought. I retrieve the deleted press release and discover that “If more people said yes to their partner rather than making excuses, we would actually be a more relaxed nation as sex is actually a stress buster and releases endorphins to the brain.” Elsewhere I learn that the recession and women wanting to have it all are “key factors in people’s waning libidos.”

Hmmm. Is there a story here? Can I ignore the lacklustre prose and needless repetition of the word ‘actually’ in favour of pitching a piece on National Orgasm Day?

Er, no. Someone, somewhere will go for this as a story, but I can’t see it in my Times column or as a law piece, or anywhere else for that matter. It only remains to trust that National Orgasm Day is everything it hopes to be – and to read the press releases which are relevant to my work. Talking of which, perhaps I’ll close Outlook after all.

Pictured courtesy of ArtflDodger: a painting of a woman moaning with despair at the idea that anyone would ever legitimise ‘National Orgasm Day’.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.