Seven Great Things About Sockpuppeting

November 4, 2008

What on earth is “sockpuppeting”? Why, it’s the use of a sockpuppet, of course. The New York Times has more, explaining that “This digital-age deception has … a precise definition — the act of creating a fake online identity to praise, defend or create the illusion of support for one’s self, allies or company.”

The Guardian alleges that journalist Andrew Gilligan is a serial sockpuppeteer, though the sockpuppeteer par excellence appears to be John Mackey, the chief executive of Whole Foods Market, who, says the NYT, used a fictional identity on the Yahoo message boards for nearly eight years to assail competition and promote his supermarket chain’s stock. Mackey apparently even found time to praise a haircut. His own.

If someone as high profile as Mackey opts to sockpuppet, perhaps there’s something in it? Here goes…

1. Sockpuppeting is cathartic.

ayers_cathartic_pills.png

Thanks to the web, everyone can express themselves online. So why not, after that tough 14-hour day, log on and do a bit of sockpuppeting? Far better than going to the gym, popping pills or any other of the stereotypical options for executive stress relief.

2. Sockpuppeting is Democratic.

free_speech_1.JPG

As Barack Obama nears the Promised Land, one wonders: were his campaign team better at sockpuppeting than John McCain’s? Naturally, the question is ironical, for there is not a shred of evidence to suggest that either Obama or McCain utilised this thoroughly modern marketing tool. But, if they’d wanted to, why not? The First Amendment provides for the sanctity of freedom of expression. Isn’t the sockpuppeteer merely exercising his First Amendment rights?

3. Sockpuppeting allows you to experiment with an alter ego.

nietzsche.jpg

Writers have long been fascinated by the alter ego.  The second self was the mirror, and antithesis, of the first in Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, while Oscar Wilde developed the notion further in The Picture of Dorian Gray. Conrad toyed with it, too, in The Secret Sharer. The literary sockpuppeteer will have such works in mind as he comments anonymously on articles he has written, but he should remember Nietzsche in Beyond Good and Evil:  “And if thou gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into thee.”

4. Sockpuppeting hones your dialogue skills.

dialogue.jpg

According to the NYT, “In April 2006, the Los Angeles Times pulled Michael A. Hiltzik, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, off of his blog because he had posted comments on blogs under an assumed name while feuding with readers,” while “In November, New Republic magazine suspended its culture critic Lee Siegel after it determined that he had been energetically defending himself in the discussion forums of his New Republic blog”. We’re not sure that these decisions were justified – both writers were no doubt developing their ability to write dialogue, something sadly all too lacking in most journalism.

5. If you don’t sockpuppet, you might not be doing your job.

failure.jpg

Paul Kedrosky, a venture capitalist in San Diego and author of the blog Infectious Greed, tells the NYT that people are increasingly resorting to sock-puppetry. “I’m convinced it’s broader than anybody knows,” he says, “I’m convinced this is the tip of the iceberg.” Kedrosky is right. In the words of one senior newspaperman, “There are no rules. A blog post without a comment is like an empty restaurant. I’m not saying that you should post comments on your own stories. But there are no rules…” We get the picture.

6. Multiple sockpuppeting is intellectually stimulating.

a-double-life-of-veronique-double_life_veronique-12.jpg

Why stop at one sockpuppet? The serious, professional sockpuppeteer knows the truth of The Double Life of Veronique – that you can never have too many marionettes.  Multiple sockpuppeting is merely the postmodern online incarnation of Whitman’s famous Song of Myself, in which he announced that “I am large. I contain multitudes.” It keeps your mind active, allows more than just one alter ego and is really just good practice for writing a play.

7. Sockpuppeting reminds you of Sooty.

sooty.jpg

To sockpuppet is to inhabit the realm of Sooty. It is to revisit, in these perilous, fraught and combative times, a mental space of fun and abandon. Indeed, some of the best sockpuppeteers are believed to dress up as Sooty before sockpuppeting.  Once they have sockpuppeted, they return to their formal garb. Sometimes they switch between grey suit and Sooty suit a hundred times a day, though it is not known whether, each time they change into their Sooty suits, they chant “Izzy whizzy let’s get busy!”

“I suspect they do,” says Sweep, rather wearily, for he, like all canines, functions best when the rules are clear.

sweep.jpg

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Good work by Rusbridger

February 10, 2012
scissors

The headline says it all: ‘Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger takes pay cut‘.

Dan Sabbagh’s piece says a bit more: said editor ‘emailed staff at the newspaper to say that his salary in the upcoming 2012-13 financial year will be £395,010, compared with £438,900 in the current financial year’.

Some voices say: ‘How worthy.’

Others opine: ‘Well, he would, wouldn’t he?’

But we say: good work by Mr Rusbridger. For the sake of the media’s survival, we hope that others in senior positions in the industry will follow suit.

Image of toolkit allegedly deployed by Alan Rusbridger courtesy of Flickr user LollyKnit.

From the inside of the maze, ethically outwards

February 9, 2012

Curious times in the media; strange days at The Times.

Would ‘Dacre Cards‘ – the system of licensing journalists proposed by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre – have prevented the embarrassment now palpable at the Times over the NightJack story?

Times editor James Harding’s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry seemed heartfelt and contrite, albeit that the paper’s former long-serving and much-respected lawyer, Alastair Brett, seems to have been, er, rather dropped in it. Clearly, mistakes were made with regard to NightJack by young reporter Patrick Foster who, once he had hacked into NightJack’s account and thus discovered his identity, then embarked on a quest to expose it via legitimate methods. This, as Inquiry counsel Robert Jay QC put it, was “rather like working from the inside of the maze out”.

But had Foster been licensed via a Dacre Card, would this unsavoury episode in the Times’s history have been avoided?

We suspect not. A raft of laws were in existence at precisely the time when many News of the World journalists seemed to believe that they were entitled to hack any phone they liked. Those laws forbade them from doing so, and yet made no difference. Aside from the obvious objection to them – that they will squeeze out freelancers and citizen journalists – Dacre Cards would simply amount to something to circumvent.

What is really required is an ethical shake-up, from top to bottom. Society generally – not just journalists – needs a sense that some things are just plain wrong.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.