Ten Images Not to Use in Law Firm Marketing

November 9, 2009

Picture the scene. A law firm has just appointed a PR agency. The latter’s brief is to spread the word and assist in the redesign of the firm’s logo. Here is some advice on the images not to use.

1. Skateboards.

skate decks

Even if the senior partner is an ex-skater au fait with all things Dogtown, skateboards are not law firm friendly. Resist at all costs. (Image courtesy of when i was a bird on Flickr.)

2. Gavels.

These seem like a safe bet but convey authoritariansim and a lack of imagination. Acceptable if the only alternative is a skateboard.

3. Nude or Semi-Dressed Women.

There is a time and place for such imagery. But it’s never, ever on a law firm’s website.

law books4. Law Books.

Intimidating to the vast majority of people, even lawyers. Avoid. (With thanks to Mike Rogers 303.)

5. Nude or Semi-Dressed Men.

There is a time and a place for such imagery. But if your PR suggests it’s on your website, sever the retainer immediately.

6. The Scales of Justice.

Cliched. If this was the best you could come up with, your legal problem solving skills are likely to be limited.

7. Guns.

Even if you specialize in firearms law, guns aren’t a good idea.

8. Courtroom Steps.

Cf. Boring, hackneyed, indicative of a lack of flair.

9. Ocean-going Yachts.

Do you want to alienate potential clients by ostentatiously displaying the world to which you have access? No? Then scupper the yacht.

10. Rockets.

rocket

Per ardua ad astra? Perhaps. But actions speak louder than images. If you’re tempted to use an image of a rocket on your law firm’s website, the chances are that you need more than merely PR advice. (Image courtesy of Adrian Florea.)

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.