The Magnificent Seven Christmas Books for Lawyers

December 11, 2009

So, a loved one is a lawyer? Naturally, he or she has already got everything, even, in today’s world, a good PR advisor. But there’s more to life than hourly charge-out rates, conditional fee arrangements and image. There’s reading. Here are the Magnificent Seven Christmas Books for Lawyers.

drunk-santa-london

1. Weird Cases by Gary Slapper.

Weird Cases: Comic and Bizarre Cases from Courtrooms Around the World is the book of Professor Gary Slapper’s hugely entertaining Times column. In it, you’ll learn of the judge would flipped a coin to decide a case and his colleague in surrealism, a man who demanded a foot massage from a clerk. All human life is here but beware: you will never enter a courtroom with quite the same faith in justice again.

2. 101 Ways to Leave the Law by Alex Steuart Williams.

No surprise that an author affiliated with the Times makes the Magnificent Seven. It is, after all, the lawyer’s paper of record. This one is by the man who pens the cartoon for the Law pages. He wouldn’t contend that it possessed Proustian depth but he would be within his rights to say that it’ll make you – and your nearest, dearest lawyer – chuckle.

3. Baby Barista by Tim Kevan.

Barrister-turned-writer Kevan seems to have secured more plaudits than a Nobel prize winner with his first novel, a romp through London’s Inns of Court. Baby Barista is fast, furious and effervescent, a Bucks Fizz-meets-Machiavelli of a book. Fans might care to slip a book token amid its pages – Kevan is penning a sequel.

4. Happy Hour is for Amateurs: Work Sucks. Life Doesn’t Have To by The Philadelphia Lawyer.

The anonymous scribe exposes the “fraudulent, greedy underbelly of a system in which ambitious lawyers are only as valuable as their last set of billable hours”. It’s non-fiction, then. Genre – and authorial identity – aside, the book has echoes of John Kennedy Toole’s A Confederacy of Dunces. Well worth a read, in other words.

5. Wrecking Machine by Alex Wade.

OK, we admit it. This one came out a while ago. It’s got precisely nothing to do with Christmas and lacks any kind of contemporaneous peg. But its author – another lawyer-turned-writer – tells us that he will be having an operation over Christmas, one caused, in part, by the very boxing that he described (rather well, we think) in Wrecking Machine. Admirably, Wade says he has no regrets, but he also allows that he could do with a royalty cheque. We’re happy to commend his book, especially to all lawyers thinking of taking up boxing. The inscription on the first page writes itself: “Don’t”.

6. Defending the Guilty: Truth and Lies in the Criminal Courtroom by Alex McBride.

An unflinching look at British criminal justice by a practising barrister not afraid to write under his own name. Excellent.

7. Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law, edited by Mads Andenas and Duncan Fairgrieve.

No less a lawyer than Shami Chakrabarti recommends this “giant of an essay collection,” whose highlights include Dame Mary Arden on the tradition that links Mill to the Human Rights Act and Clayton and Tomlinson on Bingham’s vital role during the War on Terror. Hefty, heady, huge – but no lawyer should be without it. Just leaven with Wade, season with McBride and stir with Kevan and your Christmas legal cocktail will run and run.

The image, from Santarchy & Santacon, reminds us of Bad Santa. If we were listing films this would be a definite contender, both for its relentless biting satire and, if you’re a lawyer, the challenge of working how many separate criminal offences Santa and his little helpers commit.


 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

If you’re Joey Barton, attack is not the best form of defence

May 17, 2012

Interesting times, these, in the life of Joey Barton.

If the violence displayed by the QPR captain at Manchester City last Sunday was remarkable, his subsequent conduct on Twitter has been astonishing. Barton appears to have radically reinterpreted the notion that attack is the best form of defence, lashing out at all and sundry via a series of tweets whose ultimate effect is entirely self-destructive.

In the past 24 hours, Barton has accepted one charge of violent conduct at the Etihad Stadium but denied another. The FA seems set to throw the book at him, and his club has declared that it will deal with the matter after the result of the FA investigation. Conspiracy theorists might conclude that QPR’s management team and board hope that the FA ban Barton for so long a period (four months and more) that their reported desire to rip up his contract can only be bolstered.

What, then, should Barton do? Should he:

(a) Keep his head down and say nothing, or

(b) Issue a sensible statement in which he acknowledges that both his conduct at the Etihad and subsequent tweets have brought QPR into disrepute, and

(c) Add an apology to said statement, or

(d) Go to Portugal, log onto Twitter and tweet that the world is against him but that he doesn’t care because everyone is a moron and he’s worked really hard to get where he is and if anyone is nasty to him again he is going to expose their secrets.

The answer is not (d).

The moral of the story is that if you’re a loose cannon, when you turn attack into defence there is a danger that you will blow yourself up.

Gunning foglessly for clarity

May 15, 2012

A fine piece, this, on Winston Churchill’s gift for language and the obscurantism that goes with so much corporate communication.

But wait, what’s this? Could this injunction have been phrased rather more successfully:

Be concrete, not abstract. Use metaphors to get your message across.

Metaphors are, by definition, not exactly concrete. But be that as it may: there is a lot of sound advice in Clare Lynch’s piece and a revelation, too. We had never heard of the Gunning Fog Index.  But it exists, and reveals the age at which someone would have to leave full-time education to understand given text.

We’re pleased to display our own Gunning Fog rating for the above words. That of the Churchill speech cited by Ms Lynch was 9.698.

The Gunning Fog index is 9.585

Spin at the Leveson Inquiry

May 9, 2012
Leveson witch hunt

The idea that Lord Justice Leveson and his Inquiry’s QC, Robert Jay, are in need of PR advice is intriguing.

Surely their respective tasks ought to be immune from spin? Then again, perhaps the way in which they execute them is deserving of some communications advice. Either way, times have changed. A similar inquiry from yesteryear (and such do exist) would surely not have been accompanied, albeit informally, by communications advice.

Pictured courtesy of this Flickr user: a portrait of the Leveson Inquiry.