The Nine Cardinal Sins of PR

July 15, 2009

Swordplay’s denizens are well versed in the art of PR. It’s what we do, so we should be. But our sometime scribe, Alex Wade, isn’t convinced that everyone in the PR industry is quite so savvy. Here are his Nine Cardinal Sins of PR – commit any one of them at your peril.

1. Egregious English.

Writers and journalists like words. Damn it, some of us even love them. We use them with fidelity and respect. So please don’t send us press releases full of spelling howlers and grammatical infelicities. They just end up in the bin.

2. Phoning when we’ve asked to be emailed.

There are a number of ways in which journalists post requests for information. Many of us, when doing so, request that we’re emailed, not phoned. That way we can marshall our workloads and concentrate on writing. So don’t, unless you know the journalist in question very well, pick up the phone just because you have our phone number in your contacts book. It’s annoying.

3. The “Hi there” mass overture.

Journalists develop specialisms, and we like to feel that our knowledge is valued. So when you send an email to everyone in your database, saying “Hi there”, we feel a little miffed. A tailor-made email might take more time, but at least we’ll read it. Those beginning “Hi there” are deleted.

4. Being Dim.

If we’re writing a story about high street law firms and how they’re coping with the recession, we don’t want to be asked if a leading City firm’s senior partner can contribute. If we’re writing a column for the Times on coastal life, we don’t relish being given statistics on the numbers of people holidaying in the Cotswolds. If we’re covering an arts event, we don’t need information about the forthcoming football season. You get the picture. Always think carefully about the story and pitch your client accordingly. Or not, as the case may be.

5. Not Responding.

Journalists are busy people and so are PRs. But the nature of the relationship means that while it’s OK if we ignore a press release, it’s not OK for a PR to fail to call us back. Always get back to a journalist who’s shown interest in your client, even if the story has moved on elsewhere.

6. Being Pushy.

There’s a thin line between reasonably promoting your client and harassment. One follow up email might be OK but several, all asking if we’ve had a chance to think about your pitch, will only irritate us. Counter-intuitive as it may sound, in PR silence can sometimes be golden.

7. Allowing a journalist to pay for lunch/drinks/dinner/hospitality.

Never, ever, under any circumstances, accept a journalist’s offer to pay. If it’s been made, it’s out of a sense of etiquette, but etiquette also demands that the offer is firmly refused. The journalist who pays for a PR’s lunch is the one who goes away thinking that something didn’t quite add up. He’s also the journalist whose attention moves on elsewhere, quicker than you should have said “Don’t be silly, I insist”.

8.  Asking when the piece will be published.

Why do this? We haven’t a clue. We’re writers, mere hired guns toiling for unseen editors and their obscure aims. If you’re desperate, give our paymasters a call and see where you get.

9. Allowing clients to correct copy.

Sometimes, we might send a draft of a piece to you, perhaps because copy approval has been agreed or because we’re keen to avoid libel or any other legal risks. If we do, make sure, at all costs, that your client resists the urge to “improve” our copy. We want factual accuracy checked, or a quote confirmed if our interview has been especially wide-ranging and digressive. We don’t want someone telling us that we can’t write. Even if your client is as gifted as Marcel Proust, remember – we’re the ones writing the story. Any other view means that we’re back to square one – and that’s no good for anybody.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Not so right said Fred

February 2, 2012
fred hat

So Farewell, then, Sir Fred Goodwin.

Now you are just Fred.

Not Right Said Fred, but plain Fred.

The Forfeiture Committee did for you.

No one had heard of it before,

But Dave said it had to act, and it did.

Trouble is that no one knows what to think.

Is it ‘Alas, poor Fred‘,

Or ‘Hurray! Sir Fred is dead!’?

We don’t know.

Do you?

By A. Mob, aged 1,378 and a half.

London Goes AWOL

January 31, 2012
CNN

STOP PRESS:

Fed up with being stuck on the Thames in south-east England, London yesterday decided to move. In a dramatic gesture which augurs ill for the Olympics, the city upped sticks and relocated to East Anglia.

Lawyers were not consulted about the move, and the city’s precise motivation remains unclear. However, financiers fear that London’s decision is a sign that it wishes to downsize. Moreover, a source from London said: “We no longer want to be Britain’s seat of power. If the Scots can deregulate, why can’t we? East Anglia is a nice place where nothing happens. It’s time for a quiet life. Please respect our right to privacy.”

Elsewhere, Birmingham did not do anything, but Manchester was seen to be packing its bags. “There’s an opportunity for us,” said Manchester. “We can become London.”

East Anglia said: “We don’t mind. It’ll be refreshing to be associated with something other than fens and flatness.”

A cartologist at CNN, which broke the extraordinary news, was later fired.

An excellent ad if ever there was one

January 25, 2012
legovader

We seem to be visually led this week but sometimes words proliferate far too much and letting an image do the talking is no bad thing. That’s another way of saying that ACCESS Agency’s work with Lego is absolutely top drawer.