Wanted: French judge (must be well-adjusted)

October 27, 2009

troiscouleursrouge1994t

Yesterday we spoke of the American lawyer whose legal secretaries had to be adept at more than mere paperwork. Our occasional scribe, Alex Wade, contacted us as soon as he read our post. “I have a story about something just as bizarre,” he said, perhaps a little too breathlessly. He said it concerned a French judge and Wade’s former life as a lawyer in the ‘adult lifestyle’ sector. Intrigued, we said he could send in the following column, which appeared in the Independent on Sunday a few years ago…

In France, they kiss on main street.  So sang Joni Mitchell, enamoured of all things Gallic back in the seventies.  Recently, however, it seems that across the Channel, they do rather more in a court of law than merely kiss.

A judge in Angoulême is alleged to have taken French joie de vivre to new levels.  So excited was he by a female lawyer’s advocacy, that he is alleged to have reached inside his judicial gown, unzipped his trousers, and performed “unmistakable movements.”  Unfortunately for him, he was seen not just by the object of his affections but also by a journalist and a woman in the public gallery.  He was promptly carted off and is now suspended, pending the outcome of psychiatric tests.

Poor judge.  There are surely those among us in the legal profession who have occasionally engaged in deep sexual fantasy in court.  After all, sometimes it’s so dull that there is nothing better to do.  Or, perhaps, the Law Society’s finest have contemplated quietly retiring in those moments of stress in the workplace, to a world where their solipsism is complete (as Nabokov put it).  There but for the grace of God go the errant French judge’s legal brethren.

Or do they?  Perhaps my vague stirrings of sympathy for the French judge are the consequence of two years as a lawyer responsible for celebrated top-shelf magazines such as Asian Babes, Shaven Haven and, a little less creatively, Big Ones. It was a phase I went through and now it’s over, but back then I was surrounded by images whose raison d’etre was the promotion of onanism.  I alone in legal London was entitled – nay, required – to have a stack of porn on my desk.

How my friends in their staid City jobs envied me.  Not only did I have to peruse top-shelf literature for a living, I also had to watch my company’s other venture into soft porn, The Fantasy Channel. The executives employing me never liked the description of their products as pornography, preferring the term ‘adult lifestyle.’  I once argued the toss with them, brandishing my ‘A’ level in Ancient Greek and pointing out that if pornography literally meant ‘writing about women of easy virtue,’ there was little argument when one considered the content of Asian Babes or The Fantasy Channel.  Like so much advocacy, this argument fell on stony ground.

Initially, the lifestyle espoused in this strange world had its effect.  I found it difficult to concentrate on things like commercial contracts and county court claims, assailed by a plague of arousal.  But soon, the sweet-shop overkill got to me.  Where was the fun in a picture of a beautiful naked woman?  I had overdosed, and, it seemed, adult lifestyle wasn’t for me.

But then one day a student applied for some work experience.  I was a little worried that she was unaware of the adult lifestyle nature of our business.  There will be plenty of images that some people find offensive, I said, do you mind?  No, I do not, she said, and so one fine and balmy June day she arrived for work.  She had bags of enthusiasm and, I couldn’t help but notice, was rather pretty.  I set her to work on a contract but she soon dealt with this.  Can’t I legal some of the tapes, she offered, and fed up with them as I was, I was only too happy to accommodate her.

This was a mistake.  It was a long, hot summer and my concentration problems returned with renewed vigour.  “Is this legally OK?” my student would say, wondering into my office with the proof of next month’s centrefold.  Or she would ring from the studio, where she had just watched the latest Fantasy Channel offering, worried that there were one or two scenes that were so problematic that I really ought to come and watch them with her.  Slowly but surely, as we together ensured that only the most legally virtuous material would go out under the company’s name, I began to think that adult lifestyle wasn’t so bad.

At the end of the day, I managed neither to embrace the French judge’s controversial decision nor to indulge in a rather more consensual, intimate version of it.  I moved on, she moved on, we all moved on.  And now, in Angoulême, it looks like there’ll soon be a new judge in town.  As I used to say to myself, it’s a dirty job, but someone’s got to do it.

And so you see, as Wade told us, these things don’t just happen in America. But while he went on to write books and file copy for a number of broadsheets and national magazines, he couldn’t tell us what happened to the French judge. Does anyone know?

Pictured: a French judge, Kieslowski-style.

 

Comments

Please submit comments to Swordplay below.

Good work by Rusbridger

February 10, 2012
scissors

The headline says it all: ‘Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger takes pay cut‘.

Dan Sabbagh’s piece says a bit more: said editor ‘emailed staff at the newspaper to say that his salary in the upcoming 2012-13 financial year will be £395,010, compared with £438,900 in the current financial year’.

Some voices say: ‘How worthy.’

Others opine: ‘Well, he would, wouldn’t he?’

But we say: good work by Mr Rusbridger. For the sake of the media’s survival, we hope that others in senior positions in the industry will follow suit.

Image of toolkit allegedly deployed by Alan Rusbridger courtesy of Flickr user LollyKnit.

From the inside of the maze, ethically outwards

February 9, 2012

Curious times in the media; strange days at The Times.

Would ‘Dacre Cards‘ – the system of licensing journalists proposed by Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre – have prevented the embarrassment now palpable at the Times over the NightJack story?

Times editor James Harding’s evidence to the Leveson Inquiry seemed heartfelt and contrite, albeit that the paper’s former long-serving and much-respected lawyer, Alastair Brett, seems to have been, er, rather dropped in it. Clearly, mistakes were made with regard to NightJack by young reporter Patrick Foster who, once he had hacked into NightJack’s account and thus discovered his identity, then embarked on a quest to expose it via legitimate methods. This, as Inquiry counsel Robert Jay QC put it, was “rather like working from the inside of the maze out”.

But had Foster been licensed via a Dacre Card, would this unsavoury episode in the Times’s history have been avoided?

We suspect not. A raft of laws were in existence at precisely the time when many News of the World journalists seemed to believe that they were entitled to hack any phone they liked. Those laws forbade them from doing so, and yet made no difference. Aside from the obvious objection to them – that they will squeeze out freelancers and citizen journalists – Dacre Cards would simply amount to something to circumvent.

What is really required is an ethical shake-up, from top to bottom. Society generally – not just journalists – needs a sense that some things are just plain wrong.

Supreme Court on Twitter

February 6, 2012

Something remarkable happened today. Yes, the Supreme Court launched its Twitter feed. It even has a Twitter policy, one of caveats, disclaimers and little by way of illumination but regardless: who would have thought that the successor body to the House of Lords would stoop to engage with the world of tweets, hashtags and retweets?

We look forward to the day when court business will be conducted via Twitter. Meantime, check out this link for an excellent blog on the Supreme Court.